MechanicalApr 2026
Fail-Safe Bolted Joint Design
Sole Analyst — MECH3110 Individual Assignment
A structural design brief for a public swing installation in Christchurch, one of New Zealand's most seismically active regions. The requirement was fail-safe: if Joint C collapses entirely, Joint B must still hold. That left a 3.5 m cantilever carrying full dynamic swing loads from three simultaneous users with no redundancy.
- Modelled worst-case loading as three 100 kg adults swinging at 12 km/h simultaneously, giving 7,852 N vertical reaction and 14,134 N·m bending moment at the joint
- Chose 250UC73 Universal Column over standard UB for superior torsion resistance from its square 254 × 254 mm profile
- Applied non-uniform moment distribution rather than equal-split assumption; the outermost bolts carry 19.17 kN tensile and 9.65 kN shear each
- All three failure modes cleared (FOS 3.95 yield, 13.81 separation); caught geometric edge distance at 1.44 and recommended moving from 65 mm to 72 mm
Tech Stack
Shigley's Bolted Joint AnalysisMATLABInkscapeFail-Safe DesignSeismic Loading

Gallery










Challenges
- Applying non-uniform moment distribution to find the true peak bolt load under combined bending and shear
- Computing dynamic swing forces for three simultaneous users at the bottom of arc and peak of swing
- Catching a geometric tear-out margin of 1.44 that passed stress checks but flagged a real edge-distance risk
Outcomes
- FOS of 3.95 against bolt yielding and 13.81 against joint separation under worst-case loading
- Pretension of 190.6 kN per bolt creates a slip-critical joint, so shear never governs
- All schematics and plots produced from scratch in Inkscape and MATLAB