Back to projects
    MechanicalApr 2026

    Fail-Safe Bolted Joint Design

    Sole Analyst — MECH3110 Individual Assignment

    A structural design brief for a public swing installation in Christchurch, one of New Zealand's most seismically active regions. The requirement was fail-safe: if Joint C collapses entirely, Joint B must still hold. That left a 3.5 m cantilever carrying full dynamic swing loads from three simultaneous users with no redundancy.

    • Modelled worst-case loading as three 100 kg adults swinging at 12 km/h simultaneously, giving 7,852 N vertical reaction and 14,134 N·m bending moment at the joint
    • Chose 250UC73 Universal Column over standard UB for superior torsion resistance from its square 254 × 254 mm profile
    • Applied non-uniform moment distribution rather than equal-split assumption; the outermost bolts carry 19.17 kN tensile and 9.65 kN shear each
    • All three failure modes cleared (FOS 3.95 yield, 13.81 separation); caught geometric edge distance at 1.44 and recommended moving from 65 mm to 72 mm
    Tech Stack
    Shigley's Bolted Joint AnalysisMATLABInkscapeFail-Safe DesignSeismic Loading
    Fail-Safe Bolted Joint Design

    Gallery

    Gallery 1
    Gallery 2
    Gallery 3
    Gallery 4
    Gallery 5
    Gallery 6
    Gallery 7
    Gallery 8
    Gallery 9
    Gallery 10

    Challenges

    • Applying non-uniform moment distribution to find the true peak bolt load under combined bending and shear
    • Computing dynamic swing forces for three simultaneous users at the bottom of arc and peak of swing
    • Catching a geometric tear-out margin of 1.44 that passed stress checks but flagged a real edge-distance risk

    Outcomes

    • FOS of 3.95 against bolt yielding and 13.81 against joint separation under worst-case loading
    • Pretension of 190.6 kN per bolt creates a slip-critical joint, so shear never governs
    • All schematics and plots produced from scratch in Inkscape and MATLAB

    © 2025–2026 Venuja Rodrigo · UNSW Mechanical Engineering